Scientific Program - Multiple Sclerosis
Please see below the CONy Scientific Program. Please click on the appropriate section (ordered by ABC) to view the relevant program. Please note that the program and timing is subject to change. To view the program timetable, please click here
|
Adamantiades-Behçet's disease | The Brain and Mind in Greek Philosophy | Contursi Kindred |
Dementia |
Epilepsy |
Headache | Multiple Sclerosis | Neuroimmunology |
Rehabilitation / Sleep | Stroke |
Section Heads: Nikolaos Grigoriadis, Greece & Olaf Stuve, USA |
|
|||
8:00-9:00 | MS Plenary Symposium | ||
Balancing the risks of immunosuppression in MS Mark Freedman, Canada Immunomodulation - The new buzzword in MS therapy Andrew Chan, Switzerland |
|||
9:10-11:00 |
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS): MEASUREMENT OF PROGRESSION
|
||
Chairs: Evangelia Kararizou, Greece; Rana Shiraliyeva, Azerbaijan | |||
9:10-10:05 | |||
Capsule: |
Currently, neurologist rely on clinical relapses, accumulation of neurological disability, and the number and activity of lesions on MRI to measure disease activity in MS patients. There is a quest for biological markers to predict and characterize this disorder, as well as to monitor pharmacotherapies. Are CSF studies ready for prime time?
|
||
9:10-09:20 |
Host: Mark Freedman, Canada
|
||
9:20-09:35 |
Pro: Uros Rot, Slovenia
|
||
9:35-09:50 | Con: Bart Vanwijmeersch, Belgium | ||
9:50-10:05 | Discussion and rebuttals | ||
10:05-11:00 | Proposition: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an essential tool in following up MS patients | ||
Capsule: |
Neurologists follow MS patients by assessing them clinically, and by obtaining magnetic
resonance images of the brain and spinal cord in regular intervals. Neither method is very good at quantifying the progression of the disease. There is an unmet need for a reliable and inexpensive method to monitor patients with multiple sclerosis. Has OCT fulfilled its promise to be that method?
|
||
10:05-10:15 |
Host: Athina Papadopoulou, Switzerland
|
||
10:15-10:30 |
Yes: Friedemann Paul, Germany
|
||
10:30-10:45 | Not yet: Jacek Losy, Poland | ||
10:45-11:00 |
Discussion and rebuttals | ||
11:00-11:15 |
Coffee Break
|
||
11:15-13:10 | MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS) PATHOGENESIS | ||
Chair: Zbigniew Stelmasiak, Poland & Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos, Greece |
|||
11:15-12:15 | |||
Capsule: |
The etiology of MS remains an enigma. Currently, 205 risk alleles have been
associated with MS susceptibility, but each one has a very minor effect size. There are also observations that associate environmental factors and infectious agents with MS. What is the magnitude of genetic and environmental contributors to the pathogenesis of this disorder? Which ones are more important?
|
||
11:15-11:25 |
Host: Uros Rot, Slovenia
|
||
11:25-11:40 | Genetic: Abhijit Chaudhuri, UK | ||
11:40-11:55 | Environmental Risk Factors: Ron Milo, Israel | ||
11:55-12:15 | Discussion and rebuttals | ||
12:15-13:10 | |||
Capsule: |
Neurologists and sceintists are divided with regard to the pathogenesis of MS. Is it "outside in", meaning that an aberrant adaptive immune response drives an organ-specific inflammatory disease that leads to neurodegeneration, or is it "inside out", meaning that a neurodegenerative process releases autoantigens into immune compartments and triggers a secondary autoimmune process.
|
||
12:15-12:25 | Host: Olaf Stuve, USA | ||
12:25-12:40 | Inflammation: Jacek Losy, Poland | ||
12:40-12:55 | Separate Process: Nikolaos Grigoriadis, Greece | ||
12:55-13:10 | Discussion and rebuttals | ||
15:00-17:00 |
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS): TREATMENT AND PROGRESSION
|
||
Chair: Erieta Pelidou, Greece | |||
15:00-15:50 | Debate: MS treatment algorithms: Escalating procedures vs. Induction approaches | ||
Capsule: |
There are currently 14 approved agents for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. All these agents are effective in reducing the frequency of clinical relapses. However, these medications have very distinct safety-to efficacy ratios. It is currently not possible to predict with certainty whether a patient will have a benign or aggressive disease course. Should neurologist be cautious and start therapy with a moderately effective but safe agent, or should they start with a very potent agent that may alter the disease course?
|
||
15:00-15:10 | Host: Ludwig Kappos, Switzerland | ||
15:10-15:25 | Induction: Wolfgang Bruck, Germany | ||
15:25-15:40 | Escalation: Olaf Stuve, USA | ||
15:40-15:50 | Discussion and rebuttals | ||
17:00-17:15 | Coffee Break | ||
17:15-19:00 | MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS) | ||
|
Chairs: Asmahan Alshubaili, Kuwait (TBC); Cris Constantinescu, UK |
||
17:15-18:15 | Proposition: Relapses do not matter in relation to long term disability |
||
Capsule: | All approved pharmacotherapies for patients with multiple sclerosis are effective in reducing the frequency of clinical relapses. The ultimate goal is to diminish the accumulation of neurological disability over time. Do current therapies accomplish that goal? |
||
17:15-17:25 | Host: Jera Kruja, Albania |
||
17:25-17:40 | Pro: Andrew Chan, Switzerland |
||
17:40-17:55 | Con: Abhijit Chaudhuri, UK |
||
17:55-18:15 | Discussion and rebuttals | ||
18:15-19:00 | Lecture: What we can learn from failed drug studies in MS |
||
Mark Freedman, Canada |
|
|||
10:45-12:45 |
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS)
|
||
Chair: Elizabeth Andreadou, Greece | |||
10:15-11:10 |
Proposition: Leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI is a promising biomarker to monitor disease worsening, especially in progressive MS patients |
||
Capsule: | At this time it is difficult to determine the degree of cortical gray matter pathology in-vivo in MS patients. Because cortical subpial lesion pathology is challenging to visualize using 3T MRI, assessing leptomeningeal contrast enhancement has the potential to become an indirect marker of cortical pathology. This debate will discuss pros and cons of using this recently proposed imaging biomarker in clinical trials, research studies and routine follow-up of MS patients. | ||
10:15-10:25 | Host: Flavia Nelson, USA | ||
10:25-10:40 | Pro: Robert Zivadinov, USA | ||
10:40-10:55 | Con: Hans-Peter Hartung, Germany | ||
10:55-11:10 | Discussion and rebuttals | ||
11:10-12:10 | Debate: Brain atrophy measurements should be used to guide therapy in MS | ||
Capsule: | The brain of MS patients shrinks over the disease course. How can this knowledge be utilized to understand this disease? Do pharmacological interventions alter the rate of brain atrophy? Should we measure this effect in following up patients? | ||
11:10-11:20 | Host: Jens Wuerfel, Germany | ||
11:20-11:35 | Pro: Robert Zivadinov, USA | ||
11:35-11:50 | Con: Ludwig Kappos, Switzlerand | ||
11:50-12:10 | Discussion and rebuttals |